Censorship at WordPress
I meant to get to this sooner... I really did. The plan was to actually post on a Saturday, which isn't exactly common for me. However, in this instance, the cause was good enough to be worth it.
Then I sat down and found out Blogger was going to have yet another of their untimely maintenance outages, so I logged off whilst promising myself I'd get back to it in a few hours... or Sunday at the latest. Seeing as how this is Monday, I think we all know how well that worked. I guess I'll start by apologizing to Janie, Kate and Lou for taking so damn long, but I'm still going to say my piece.
Here's the story: not long ago, Janie and Kate wrote a short bit of serial erotica from two differing points of view (me linky you long time). To be quite honest, it really wasn't all that dirty in comparison to some of the shit I've read on the web, and it had a style I respect where things are more hinted at than graphically described. Allowing the imagination to fill in the blanks is a great way to fly, and works well in nearly every literary genre (the main reason I like Steven Stephen King's older works). Forcing the reader's imagination to become actively involved in the story adds a bit of investment for the reader, and keeps them coming back.
Unfortunately for the girls, some asshole at WordPress apparently objected. It's not that erotica and sex are taboo topics for WP blogs... the only thing we can figure is that someone took issue with the involvement of a priest in the story. Janie and Kate suddenly found their tags no longer appearing on WP's main pages, and no searches in WP returned hits. All this, and no warning or explanation. A few emails to the support staff received half-assed excuses in reply... something about "we don't want kids accidentally running into your stuff or people getting in trouble at work".
Bullshit.
You see, the problem is that other blogs tagged with "sex" or "erotica" were still there. Subsequent emails were ignored outright. Eventually, another blog started up in support of Janie and Kate, and the snowball started rolling. The "erotica" tag disappeared from WP yet the "sex" tag remained, so at least the girls weren't being singled out anymore. The shit really hit the fan when blogs showing support for the girls, even those without any objectionable content, began to be delisted as well.
Call the girls pot-stirrers or troublemakers all you want, but when some asshat can't simply admit to being overzealous with the censorship, and then starts delisting other blogs just for having the nerve to stand up, we have ourselves a serious problem. This is one of those times where I'm happy to be on Blogger and can tell the WP folks exactly what I think:
You goddamned prudes need to remove the proverbial sticks from your asses and lighten up. Seriously. The girls' stuff isn't remotely as bad as any of the shit I've seen on the web, and it's the reader's responsibility to decide for themselves whether something is objectionable or not. If the average Joe can find high resolution shots of Brittney Spears' naughty bits on Technorati without any trouble, but a literary depiction of a priest in a sexual situation causes several blogs to be delisted from WP, I think you fuckers need to rethink your stance. The reality is that some blogs carry mature content, and it's up to the user to decide what's bad or not. There's software available for parents to filter content available to their kids that can be set up based on tags, and companies can use the same stuff for employee computer accounts (I should know... mine does).
Seriously: what the fuck do you think you guys are protecting people from anyway? Sex and sexual thoughts are a reality of life, and no amount of pretending it ain't so is going to change a goddamned thing. Are you fucking afraid that some parent is going to sue WordPress because their kid accidentally gets man mustard on the keyboard?
Get over it.
77 Package(s) of Returned Poo:
My dearest Matt,
Thank you. From the top of my garter belt to the top of my stockings, I'm feeling the love... and I hope I write well enough for you to feel it yourself... often.
Kisses to you, lots of tongue, and even a long slow grope from bo'fus.
Dream a little dream of us.
;)
Seriously: what the fuck do you think you guys are protecting people from anyway? Sex and sexual thoughts are a reality of life, and no amount of pretending it ain't so is going to change a goddamned thing. Are you fucking afraid that some parent is going to sue WordPress because their kid accidentally gets man mustard on the keyboard?
How about protecting people from std-infested perverts like yourself. Some people in this life have standards, so take your thumb out of your mouth you monkey pervert.
The girls have let me out long enough to make a rare appearance, and take a moment to say thank you, Matt.
I really appreciate your standing up for us so publicly on a blog with the amount of readership yours has.
May the seed of your loins be fruitful in the belly of your woman.
Or not, as you desire.
:)
Thanks again Matt.
The Boy
Nice Cocksnack.
Still spreading the love of Jesus, I see.
Two things assfuck:
1) As a micro guy, I more than likely take better steps to keep clean that your self-righteous ass does... in any situation.
2) Go spread your love of Jesus somewhere else. Your brand has always been worth nothing and will remain that way until you can wake the fuck up and look in a damn mirror. Hope you like what you see.
Oh, and girls (and boy), always happy to help... well, what little help I can give. I harbor no illusions that WP will listen to the likes of me, but at least they can't delist me for speaking my mind.
Still spreading the love of Jesus, I see.
Here's some love: Don't insist on being a pervert, faggot.
With love,
Yours trully
How about protecting people from std-infested perverts like yourself. Some people in this life have standards, so take your thumb out of your mouth you monkey pervert.
Um, Cocksnack, you can't catch STDs through the Internet. I mean, maybe you can in the fanciful land of the Creationist, but here on planet Earth it's simply not possible.
Furthermore, if these "people" you speak of have such high standards, why would they be surfing the sex and erotica tags at Wordpress?
Here's some love: Don't insist on being a pervert, faggot.
I seem to recall you being up in arms about bad language on other blogs. I guess God changed his infallible mind on the doctrines of cursing and judging, eh?
Oh, how the stupid have fallen. I mean, honestly, Cocksnack, is that the best you have? Calling Matt a faggot? Really?
I can't believe I actually expected better from Cocksnack!
"I can't believe I actually expected better from Cocksnack!"
Silly boy.
"Here's some love: Don't insist on being a pervert, faggot."
Listen here, fuckface. Don't insist on being a fascist scumbag cocksucking closet case.
It's fuckers like you that have fucked up the whole goddamned world, and if it were up to me, dirtbags like you would be in a mental institution getting the fucking help you need.
Ted "I Art No Homo" Haggard gonna-be, I swear.
Sorry Matt. Cocksnack is such a hypocritical fuck, it pisses me off.
No apology necessary. It would be a bit hypocritical for me to bitch someone out for their language. I'm all about the free expression, and a good flame war every once in a while is healthy. If it gets out of hand, I'll just put up another troll roast thread where everyone can hold forth at will.
Um, Cocksnack, you can't catch STDs through the Internet.
Your, right. One gets it by practicing the same perverted acts as the faggots that you defend.
Your observations are not all that impressive.
Furthermore, if these "people" you speak of have such high standards, why would they be surfing the sex and erotica tags at Wordpress?
Only perverts like yourself would be surfing the net for that stuff. Wordpress simply has the decency to make sure that it is only they that acquire it, not an innocent child.
Your, right. One gets it by practicing the same perverted acts as the faggots that you defend.
Actually, Cocksnack, you can get STDs from good old red-blooded Christian heterosexual sex in the missionary position too. Heck, you can even get 'em from your faithful virginal spouse, depending on the disease.
Your observations are not all that impressive.
Perhaps, but at least they're observations of the real world.
Only perverts like yourself would be surfing the net for that stuff. Wordpress simply has the decency to make sure that it is only they that acquire it, not an innocent child.
Actually, since you seem to be so very dense, the point is that no child would have "acquired" it even before the de-listing, unless said child was surfing the sex and erotica tags.
What would you recommend for children, Cocksnack? The Song of Solomon? Genesis 38:8-10? Oh! I know! Genesis 19:30-38! Good wholesome family reading, that.
I seem to recall you being up in arms about bad language on other blogs. I guess God changed his infallible mind on the doctrines of cursing and judging, eh?
Bad language? According to whose standards? Oh do you preffer sodomites?
Newsflash: Their is no such thing as the doctrine of cursin and judging. I see you still need to brush up on your theological definitions.
Oh, how the stupid have fallen. I mean, honestly, Cocksnack, is that the best you have? Calling Matt a faggot? Really?
I am not sure if Matt is a faggot, but as ususal you cannot read. My response was to corporate Kate.
Newsflash: Their is no such thing as the doctrine of cursin and judging. I see you still need to brush up on your theological definitions.
And you need to brush up on your reading skills, dipshit. Doctrines. I figure you take your position on linguistic matters from the Bible, so I'll let you back up your problems there. As far as a doctrine of judging, I suggest you "brush up" on Matthew 7:1.
It's fuckers like you that have fucked up the whole goddamned world, and if it were up to me, dirtbags like you would be in a mental institution getting the fucking help you need.
I am not the one having intercourse with anything that moves and posting it in the internet. So take a shower, you disgust me.
And wipe off Matt's "manjuice" as apparently he did not mention that he is going to clean it up.
Actually, Cocksnack, you can get STDs from good old red-blooded Christian heterosexual sex in the missionary position too. Heck, you can even get 'em from your faithful virginal spouse, depending on the disease.
Wishful thinking. Only in the fanciful land of the Evolutionist.
What would you recommend for children, Cocksnack? The Song of Solomon? Genesis 38:8-10? Oh! I know! Genesis 19:30-38! Good wholesome family reading, that.
Anything that's not the same perverted fantasy std-infested whorehouses that you subscribe to would be better.
"Only perverts like yourself would be surfing the net for that stuff. Wordpress simply has the decency to make sure that it is only they that acquire it, not an innocent child."
Setting aside the matter of whether said child would have to be surfing the sex and erotica tags to find the material in question, I'd like to point out that a child will react in one of two ways upon reading pornographic material, dependant largely on age/maturity:
1) "Ewwww, I don't want to read that." And then they don't.
and 2) "Wooohoo, porn!" which pretty much defies the 'innocent' label.
Porn has always struck me as a stupendously stupid thing to 'protect' people from anyway. If you don't like it, don't watch/read/look.
Also, Cocksnack's assumption that we're all STD infested fornicators is pretty amusing to me. Not only are half the people I've seen him level the charge at celibate/virginal, the other half didn't see anything wrong with fornicating.
As far as a doctrine of judging, I suggest you "brush up" on Matthew 7:1.
I doubt that your analysis of that verse would be anymore impressive than your analysis from Genesis.
Newsflash: God is goint to judge you for every wicked deed that you do.
I doubt on that day God is going to be any more impressed with your hermeneutic of Matthew 7:1.
"Setting aside the matter of whether said child would have to be surfing the sex and erotica tags to find the material in question, I'd like to point out that a child will react in one of two ways upon reading pornographic material, dependant largely on age/maturity:
1) "Ewwww, I don't want to read that." And then they don't.
and 2) "Wooohoo, porn!" which pretty much defies the 'innocent' label."
While you may be in the business of teaching your child how to hump anything with two legs, I happen to believe that it is my responsibility to protect my child from perverts like you.
Unlike you, most people have some form of decency.
I am not sure if Matt is a faggot, but as ususal you cannot read. My response was to corporate Kate
Hm, makes even less sense, then, since the only definitions I can come up with for "faggot" are "a bundle of sticks" and "a male homosexual."
Nice to see that the Cocksnack projecting is in full force. Next time you accuse someone of being unable to read, maybe you should make sure you know the difference between "Corporal" and "corporate."
Actually, Cocksnack, you can get STDs from good old red-blooded Christian heterosexual sex in the missionary position too. Heck, you can even get 'em from your faithful virginal spouse, depending on the disease.
Wishful thinking. Only in the fanciful land of the Evolutionist.
So then, just so we're clear Cocksnack, are you claiming that one must commit a Biblicly prohibeted sex act in order to contract an STD?
I'd imagine that a sizeable percentage of the people in Africa that are suffering from AIDS at the moment are straight. Is God then leveling his wrath at black people as well then?
What about people who pick up an STD via blood transfusion or other vector that is non-sexual? Surely they haven't all been 'sodomites' or whatever term you choose to use.
Or are you simply denying that all the above are valid because we're just making them up?
Please help us understand this New Testament fairytale you apparently live in. I'd much rather argue a point you agree you have made rather than be accused of setting up strawmen.
You had better hope he doesn't just on intelligence or literacy, either.
Stupid fuck.
Damn, the poo's flyin' fast, ain't it?
Wishful thinking. Only in the fanciful land of the Evolutionist.
Add to the list of things that Cocksnack doesn't believe in: the Germ Theory of Disease. I guess someone's never heard of HIV transmitted from parent to child, or any of the varieties of Herpes and Hepatitis. Heck, you can get HPV variants on parts other than genitals, without any sexual contact.
Anything that's not the same perverted fantasy std-infested whorehouses that you subscribe to would be better.
I personally subscribe to no such whorehouses, and were I to subscribe to a whorehouse, I'd at least pick one of the clean ones. This looks like more of the Cocksnack projection game.
I doubt that your analysis of that verse would be anymore impressive than your analysis from Genesis.
What analysis? That the parenting strategy of Lot is just as abhorrent as the worst STD-infested whorehouse fantasy?
Newsflash: God is goint to judge you for every wicked deed that you do.
That's right, according to the passage. And he's going to judge you for judging others. You play at being God, Cocksnack, casting down judgments from on high, but Mat 7:1 suggests that such actions are frowned upon by the person who actually has that right.
I doubt on that day God is going to be any more impressed with your hermeneutic of Matthew 7:1.
Nor will he be impressed with your ignorant ravings about faggots and STDs. Dumbass.
I'd imagine that a sizeable percentage of the people in Africa that are suffering from AIDS at the moment are straight. Is God then leveling his wrath at black people as well then?
Actually, they are practicing the same kind of monkey sex that you espouse. Stop looking at porn and do some real research.
By the way, are you really the same Cocksnack?
Even the original wasn't this stupid.
What about people who pick up an STD via blood transfusion or other vector that is non-sexual? Surely they haven't all been 'sodomites' or whatever term you choose to use.
I'm sure there are exceptions, just like everything else. But honest research will tell you that that in the majority of cases, STD's do not come from blood transfusion. And the rare cases that they do, its not the blood transfusion that gave it to them, but the blood from perverts like yourself.
I personally subscribe to no such whorehouses, and were I to subscribe to a whorehouse, I'd at least pick one of the clean ones. This looks like more of the Cocksnack projection game.
Some more wishful thinking. Only in the fanciful land of the Evolutionist will you find a clean whorehouse.
That's right, according to the passage. And he's going to judge you for judging others. You play at being God, Cocksnack, casting down judgments from on high, but Mat 7:1 suggests that such actions are frowned upon by the person who actually has that right.
2 Corinthins 2:1-16
But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man.
I Cor 6:2-3
Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?
I Thessolonians 5:21-22
21Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. 22Abstain from all appearance of evil.
I think you need to stick to your porn and leave the theology for those who actually read their Bibles.
Nor will he be impressed with your ignorant ravings about faggots and STDs. Dumbass.
I think he is impressed right now:
Ephesians 5:3-12
3But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints; 4neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks. 5For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. 6Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience. 7Be not ye therefore partakers with them. 8For ye were sometime darkness, but now are ye light in the Lord: walk as children of light; 9(for the fruit of the Spirit is in all goodness and righteousness and truth;) 10proving what is acceptable unto the Lord. 11And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.
Your knowledge of God is seriously lacking.
I deleted my comment because the way I had edited it rendered it unreadable. I'll try again:
Cocksnack, I am sure you know the dangers of unprotected sex between two men all too well.
Would it interest you to know that sex between two women is as safe as it gets. (It is not totally safe though, play safe kids.) CorpralKate is an intelligent girl, far more intelligent than you will ever be, and I am sure she takes all necessary precautions. Her risk of disease is vanishingly small.
What lesson can we draw from this? God loves ladybummers.
God hates anal sex because he tried it once and didn't like it.
Killjoy.
Would it interest you to know that sex between two women is as safe as it gets. (It is not totally safe though, play safe kids.) CorpralKate is an intelligent girl, far more intelligent than you will ever be, and I am sure she takes all necessary precautions. Her risk of disease is vanishingly small.
So she is an intelligent std-infested pervert who does not have the decency to keep her scum to herself.
Not very impressive.
Sooooo, are Human Immunodeficiency Viruses piloted by little angels who know who to infect?... Which ends up looking exactly the same as what's predicted by the mindless, morally blind virus science studies?
Ah, the fanciful land of the Cretinist.
Confirmation text: ptufckky: I'll leave the definition up to you dirtier minded people.
"So she is an intelligent std-infested pervert who does not have the decency to keep her scum to herself."
I'm as clean as a whistle, and I have the August medical report from the United States Marine Corps to prove it, fuckface.
How 'bout you? Do you make your german shepherd wear a condom when you're taking it up the ass?
Sure you want to play the ad hom game with the big girls now, pussy?
More fear and loathing out of Las Vegas.
Cocksnack should find the nearest reputable escort service and go out for a night on the town he so desperately needs.
I hope the escort would have enough sense to wear a condom though, after the german shepard and all.
shepherd.
Damn it. Janie would beat me for that one.
:)
Unlike you, most people have some form of decency.
You freely admitted that you'd be on a rape-and-murder spree if there wasn't some bearded man in the sky threatening you with punishment. You have no standing to talk to people about decency.
I'm sure there are exceptions, just like everything else. But honest research will tell you that that in the majority of cases, STD's do not come from blood transfusion. And the rare cases that they do, its not the blood transfusion that gave it to them, but the blood from perverts like yourself.
Actually, HIV is bloodborne as well as sexually transmitted. Quite a lot of people contract it now through exposure to contaminated blood. And quite a lot of people contracted it through contaminated transfusions before the safety protocols were implemented. So it is still quite possible to get HIV, an STD, without ever engaging in any Biblically immoral practices. An injury resulting in a wayward spurt of blood, a child from someone who had a transfusion before the disease was understood, etc.
At any rate, it still invalidates your claim that you can only get STDs from Biblically prohibited actions. Unless you want to show me the passage where God says "hey, don't get transfusions from people without subjecting their blood to an HIV test. Believe me, you'll understand it when you come to it."
I love the blatant racism, too. "Monkey sex," very nice. It's good to see you're an equal opportunity dipshit.
Incidentally, while the Bible goes on at length regarding rules of seeing your immediate relatives naked, it never expressly forbids premarital sex. Some people have played word games with "adultery" to twist the term beyond any conventional meaning, but you'd think if shellfish were such an important concern to the big guy, he would have included premarital sex in there too. Yet another Biblically legal way to contract HIV, Herpes, etc.
Some more wishful thinking. Only in the fanciful land of the Evolutionist will you find a clean whorehouse.
That, and Las Vegas. And Amsterdam. And all over America until a century or so ago. Do some of your own research, dipshit.
2 Corinthins 2:1-16
But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man.
So, if you judge others, no man can judge you? And you claim that the Bible never contradicts itself?
I Cor 6:2-3
Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?
So you're a saint, then?
I Thessolonians 5:21-22
21Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. 22Abstain from all appearance of evil.
I love 1 Thessalonians 5:21, because it directly refutes your every tactic, from Biblical literalism to making claims without backing them up. Prove all things, WoMI, don't just accept them uncritically. Hold fast to that which is good, and discard the rest.
By the way, who do you worship again? Jesus Christ, who said "Judge not, that ye be not judged," or Paul of Tarsus, who never met Jesus (except in a vision, or so he claims), and was not, in fact, the son of God, but says that "the saints" have the ability to judge even the angels?
I think you need to stick to your porn and leave the theology for those who actually read their Bibles.
Nah, I'll leave the theology to people who actually think about what they read instead.
I think he is impressed right now:
Your knowledge of God is seriously lacking.
Hm...you claim to be able to judge all people. You claim that God is impressed with you, and that you "know" God. That sounds an awful lot like hubris, Cocksnack. I seem to remember a saying about something going before a fall...some deadly sin or other. Maybe you can enlighten me.
By the way, as long as you're admonishing people to read:
Proverbs 8:13 "The fear of the LORD is to hate evil: pride, and arrogancy, and the evil way, and the froward mouth, do I hate."
Pride? Arrogance? Sound like anyone we know?
Note: there is now an open roast thread. Please relocate discussion to there and hold forth at will. Nothing is off-limits...
Mr. Weepon of Messy Deconstructionism seems not to understand the concept of fiction.
AWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
Damn. I quit looking at blogs for a few hours and I miss all the fun.
Ignoring all of the poo on this one...but Matt, come on dear. Steven King? Seriously?
Nicely posted, Matt. I've ranted about Blogger, and was politely (and with the best of intentions) advised that WordPress was better for such things (the mechanics of posting, the details of the 'back-end' of the software, etc.).
Now I'm extra-glad to put up with Blogger's bullshit - at least with Blogger, one can reliably infer incompetence, rather than malice, when problems arise.
Keep posting this kind of thing, please. Even if nobody at WordPress sees this post directly, I expect they'll notice some effect of this and related efforts.
Also, any attempt to censor any part of the internet strikes me as profoundly stupid and useless in the attempt.
Hopefully this doesn't get missed during all the flaming -- ;)
By "WordPress", do you mean the free blogs hosted at the WordPress site, or installations of the WordPress programs at individual sites? I run WordPress at my own site and would hate to think I might run into problems with them.
"Sooooo, are Human Immunodeficiency Viruses piloted by little angels who know who to infect?... Which ends up looking exactly the same as what's predicted by the mindless, morally blind virus science studies?"
No, they are carried by perverts like yourself who parade their sexual acts all over the internet.
"I'm as clean as a whistle, and I have the August medical report from the United States Marine Corps to prove it, fuckface."
No your not. Take a shower dirtball.
Damn it. Janie would beat me for that one.
No thanks. You can keep your sick animalist behavior.
I guess their is no limit to your homosexual perversity.
You freely admitted that you'd be on a rape-and-murder spree if there wasn't some bearded man in the sky threatening you with punishment. You have no standing to talk to people about decency.
Some more wishful thinking. I guess you like to make it up as you go.
Actually, HIV is bloodborne as well as sexually transmitted. Quite a lot of people contract it now through exposure to contaminated blood. And quite a lot of people contracted it through contaminated transfusions before the safety protocols were implemented. So it is still quite possible to get HIV, an STD, without ever engaging in any Biblically immoral practices. An injury resulting in a wayward spurt of blood, a child from someone who had a transfusion before the disease was understood, etc.
As I said, there are a few rare cases. I am sure that someone somewhere somehow got it by licking the sidewalk on his way home as well. But even in those rare cases, the blood can be traced back to perverts like yourself.
Cocksnack you're all full of pronouncements, how about backing them up with some data from reputable sources?
Incidentally, while the Bible goes on at length regarding rules of seeing your immediate relatives naked, it never expressly forbids premarital sex. Some people have played word games with "adultery" to twist the term beyond any conventional meaning, but you'd think if shellfish were such an important concern to the big guy, he would have included premarital sex in there too. Yet another Biblically legal way to contract HIV, Herpes, etc.
For someone who does not read their Bible, you sure promote yourself as the expert.
Try actually reading your Bible for once instead of googling ignorance. You were as eager in reading your Bible as you are at looking at your porn you might come with a commentary that actually makes some hermeneutical sense.
Incidentally, while the Bible goes on at length regarding rules of seeing your immediate relatives naked, it never expressly forbids premarital sex. Some people have played word games with "adultery" to twist the term beyond any conventional meaning, but you'd think if shellfish were such an important concern to the big guy, he would have included premarital sex in there too. Yet another Biblically legal way to contract HIV, Herpes, etc.
For someone who does not read their Bible, you sure promote yourself as the expert.
Try actually reading your Bible for once instead of googling ignorance. You were as eager in reading your Bible as you are at looking at your porn you might come with a commentary that actually makes some hermeneutical sense.
So, if you judge others, no man can judge you? And you claim that the Bible never contradicts itself?
No contradiction is there if you actually knew what you were talking about. The only contradiction that exists is what the Bible states and what you wish it to state.
So you're a saint, then?
Yes. Everyone that is a saved Christian is a saint. But of course that is hard for you to believe since your perception of a saint comes from a comic book.
Hold fast to that which is good, and discard the rest.
Thanks for the advice. Now its your turn. Keep your wang in your pants and stop fornicating around like a monkey sex machine.
You freely admitted that you'd be on a rape-and-murder spree if there wasn't some bearded man in the sky threatening you with punishment. You have no standing to talk to people about decency.
Cocksnack said:
Some more wishful thinking. I guess you like to make it up as you go.
Proof Cocksnack is a liar.
By the way, who do you worship again? Jesus Christ, who said "Judge not, that ye be not judged," or Paul of Tarsus, who never met Jesus (except in a vision, or so he claims), and was not, in fact, the son of God, but says that "the saints" have the ability to judge even the angels?
Actually, Jesus himself taugh Paul in the desert. One of the requirements of Apostleship is that one would have to have studied under Jesus himself. But of course, you do not read your Bible, so you would not know that. You much rather make it up as you go.
Hm...you claim to be able to judge all people. You claim that God is impressed with you, and that you "know" God. That sounds an awful lot like hubris, Cocksnack. I seem to remember a saying about something going before a fall...some deadly sin or other. Maybe you can enlighten me.
Actually, its called confidence in what God states. I am not giving you anything that is not in God's word. But God's word condemns you, because you pridefully refuse to submit yourself to your Creator. That's pride to the highest degree.
Yes Amanda, Steven King. He was pretty good back in the days before The Tommyknockers and Misery. His short stories are still pretty good as far as I'm concerned.
Just popping in to remind people that the flame war belongs in the Roast post...
You missed my point, dear Matt. It isn't Steven King, at all. It's Stephen.
Kisses to you!
Holy cow, I've been talking to Janie too much!
Shit. Remind me to make coffee before posting. Thanks for the catch.
*hangs head*
My dad says the same about the illustrious Mr. King. He basically attributes the downward spiral to the fact that he got so big that editors would no longer dare to rein him in. Sadly, it's a problem with a lot of writers.
By the way, given the initial topic of the post, I feel not at all immature in noting that I'm comment #69.
"Hopefully this doesn't get missed during all the flaming -- ;)
By "WordPress", do you mean the free blogs hosted at the WordPress site, or installations of the WordPress programs at individual sites? I run WordPress at my own site and would hate to think I might run into problems with them."
Yes, Java, it's just the freely hosted Wordpress.com blogs at issue. They can't say crap about what you do at your own site.
And Cocksnack, get the fuck off my thread.
The Stand. (yes that's a period)
One of these days I'll stop catching your...typos. :)
Amanda, I somehow missed where you were channeling me there a few comments back.
You are of course welcome to fit yourself in my shoes anytime.
But I'd rather...
um..
nevermind.
(just kidding - don't have a cow, everybody!)
;)
OMG!!! I came here by way of Evil Bender and let me tell you, This has provided me with some choice internet entertainment.
Oh, and---Just buy your own domain. At that point, you become said master of your domain. and You can do whatever the hell you want.
Wow, this beats Sunday School and sexual repression by a long way - gr8
Who ever believed a little ego-wank like Jesus could cause so much trouble!
Well, turn me into a pillar of salt anyday, but give me my sexual freedom and I reckon I can have heaven on Earth.
Neat party tricks - turn water into wine, live forever, beat pregnancy tests, float on water. John the Baptist used to smear himself with honey and go out into the desert and starve himself because his religous deity said he would come across some blue-eyed blonde that I reckon based on the movies would really look good "hanging up" on my crucifix.
Well - some may think it harsh. But those guys on the chariots with their loincloths really do have some sex appeal by the strict moral climate of their largely 1950's times.
Don't forget oral sex was once an offence for people only 3 decades ago in 54 states of the union. But people sure got on with their lives the way they chose.
Thanks for that "girlz". Sign me up for your blogs anytime - and may I be condemned to a life in hell, because it sure sounds better than a stink-arsed desert rat with a honey kink like John.
Oh yes, I'm straight - but only so far as you would like to judge my potential!!!
Speaking of censorship...
Bombs away!
YouTube censorship YouTube censorship YouTube censorship YouTube censorship YouTube censorship YouTube censorship YouTube censorship YouTube censorship YouTube censorship YouTube censorship
YouTube go boom.
They'd prefer bloggers writing about racism and stuff, rather than sex and love?
Post a Comment